prom dresses
Prom Dress Shop    
 
PRODUCT SEARCH
 
 
Sherri Hill prom dresses | Jovani prom dresses | Faviana prom dresses | La Femme prom dresses | 2009 prom dresses
 
Sherri Hill 1002 Sherri Hill 3021 Jovani prom dress Sherri Hill 2003 Sherri Hill 1050
Sherri Hill 1002
$300
Sherri Hill 3021
$500
Jovani 1551407200
$400
Sherri Hill 2003
$500
Sherri Hill 1050
$300

October 2009 Archives

Oh Boye

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
olsen_twins_at-fashion-week.jpg

The Olsen twins have launched yet a new fashion label. Generally speaking, I pretty much support the sisters' design endeavors: They tend to do fairly low-cost items (with the exception of their high-end collection, The Row, which I am pretty sure consists mostly of reeeeeeeeeally soft $200 t-shirts? Oh, fashion), they obviously work their butts off, and also: like it or not, those girls have style. Homeless granny style? Sometimes. Hobo toddler style? Occasionally. But you have to give them credit: Homeless hobo granny actually sort of ended up being a trend -- plus, the girls clearly have fun with their outfits. And their clothes are usually pretty cute.

The new line, however, is called...(wait for it) Olsen Boye. The pieces themselves aren't bad -- they appear to feature stripes and plaids prominently -- which I certainly cannot argue with, given that my entire wardrobe currently consists mostly of stripes and plaids. (According to this very un-Olseny ad, there also appears to be a highly covetable pair of brown flat oxford loafers.) And the line is being sold at JC Penney, which I also think is a smart and budget-conscious move. But I need to know the reasoning behind that extra "E." I am sure there is some "clever" and "inside" and "over-intellectualized" explanation, but from where I'm sitting it just looks like poor spelling. Luckily, even bad spellers can put together cute outfits! Explain your logic girls, and I might re-think my position.

new-moon-poster.jpg


All of those Twilight fans who have been holding their breaths until November 20 (FINALLY) have something with which to distract themselves until the big day: the track listing for the soundtrack to the upcoming New Moon film has been released. And guess what? It is an emo dream come true. The15-song compilation features tracks from artists that run the gamut of hipster cred-worthiness: standard indie favorite Death Cab for Cutie opens the album, and is followed by everyone from the soulful dream-team of St. Vincent & Bon Iver, to the appropriately somber Grizzly Bear, to our own personal favorite, Lykke Li -- a sassy Swede with unbeatable dance moves. You can stream some of the full album right here.




alisha hill.jpg

This weekend, TIZA introduces Alisha Hill prom dresses to our website. Hill -- the daughter of our favorite prominent prom and pageant dress designer Sherri Hill -- debuts her collection of 17 pieces, which range from the long and luxurious to the short and sassy to the fun and flirtatious. Hill's style has a soft, feminine, but also playful touch: she employs paisleys and leopard prints as much as pastels in her creations. (She also has a knack for the long, flowing, and ethereal.) Perfect for any prom or pageant. Check out her designs right here

More with the Carrie Prejean

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
carrie_prejean1.jpg

This Carrie Prejean drama just will not end: Apparently, the Miss California pageant is counter-suing the shamed former title-holder (who is suing THEM because she believes that she was dethroned due to her position on gay marriage) because she hasn't paid back the money they loaned her. For a... breast augmentation. Um. Okay. First a breast implants-related injury at Miss Plastic, now this?? I sort of think that if Miss California USA is going to practice such ridiculous policies, they should just deal with the consequences. Also? It does not take a genius to know that "oral agreements" carry basically zero weight. Make a real contract next time you give a 21-year-old 5 grand for fake boobs and expect her to pay you back! Just saying. 
normal_009.jpg

Anyone who has ever watched Gossip Girl knows that it is a television show that, for several reasons, is BARELY grounded in an even vague sense of reality. Of course, as is to be expected on any high school TV drama, there is the usual, obvious stuff, like Serena's hair existing in real life, and the obviously ridiculous and contrived love triangles, etc. But usually that's okay, because hello, it's television. Also, Gossip Girl obviously resonates with people for a reason, which is that a lot of the things addressed on the show (female bitchery, popularity, money, romance, etc.) actually are both realistic and relatable. But on this week's show, I was for some reason endlessly annoyed by the fact that the entire episode was based on a totally foolish and unrealistic premise. Which was that, Blair and Vanessa were vying to give a toast at a freshman "dinner" (which appeared to be more of a cocktail party). Does any college actually do this? If so, does ANY freshman in their right mind... actually go? Much less care? So that was my biggest beef with this week's episode. Other than that, there were some pros and cons. Let's do a little list.

PROS:
*The compliment watch: How can I get one? "Your teeth shine like diamonds!" What a good compliment.
*Blair's unnecessarily diabolical strategy to get Chuck to kiss that guy, and his disproportionately casual response to it.
*Vanessa's sort of ugly-awesome, Stevie Nicks-reminiscent "fancy dress." 
*"Where did you learn to give a pep talk? Guantanamo?"

CONS: 
*Vanessa's straight hair. Girl should stop with that nonsense. 
*What is up with what appears to be a writer's room joke about these Welcome Back Kotter mugs? It is getting to be as bad as the whole "Rufus is so cute with his waffles" thing.  
*Serena's outfit to the campaign office. Don't get me wrong -- the dress was awesome. But... like, is that her casual-wear? 

Next week, it looks like we're in for Halloween and sex tape drama. So far, I'm intrigued. Stay tuned.

At last night's 2009 Spike Scream Awards, the obvious winners were: Twilight, True Blood, Transformers (I guess they needed an excuse to get Megan Fox onstage?) and Star Trek. Less predictable: William Shatner, for a movie (again, Star Trek) that he ... was not in. Oh SpikeTV! How irreverent of you.

Now on to the fashion winners of the night:

gallery-msg-125589959396-3.jpg

Jamie King looks so cute and crazy! And hello people, this is Spike TV. No need to get too serious. 

mfox_gl_19oct09_pa_b_216x324.jpgMaybe one day men around the world will get sick of the "super-hot siren sex-bomb" look that Megan Fox has so artfully mastered but... I doubt it.

kristen-bell-scream-awards-2008.jpg
Kristen Bell is, as usual, appropriately dressed for the occasion: flirty, adorable, and dressed in metallic zebra-prints

Of course, not everyone was so successful...
Yikes.jpgIsabel Lucas, I am sure you are a very nice girl and potentially talented actress. But the tanning MUST STOP.


Plastic_WomenAP_450x300.jpg

This weekend, at the Miss Plastic competition (a beauty pageant in which all contestants have had breast implants and facelifts), 23-year-old woman fell off the stage because she was too top-heavy. Apparently, she had not yet grown accustomed to her newly enlarged breasts, and also because her hair extensions got in her eyes. Um. Actually, I guess that those are two understandable hurdles, and for that reason I feel bad for the girl. She tore a ligament! And, um, talk about humiliating. BUT, more importantly, what was a 23-year-old woman doing getting a facelift?! This Miss Plastic thing totally confounds me. Women in their 20s getting breast implants is not, I guess, so unusual these days. (Although personally, I would not in a million years put my own body through the medical risk. But then again, as you may have noticed, I'm a fan of a sort of gamine androgyny when it comes to fashion -- so my board-flat figure suits my sartorial preferences.) But getting facelifts?! What a sad, and scary concept. Sad because, you know, feminism, etc. Scary, because:


48a19b6080226-424x483.jpgThink about the future, ladies!!


thumbnail.php.jpeg
In preparation for the release of the new Wes Anderson movie, Fantastic Mr. Fox, which comes out this November, I thought it would be nice to reflect on The Royal Tenenbaums, one of the most aesthetically awesome movies in the history of film. (Oh I said it!) Also,  maybe my favorite movie of all time. It is about a family of low-functioning geniuses-- the Tenenbaums -- living in a gutted-out, broken-down, and highly romanticized alternate-universe version of Brooklyn. Margot (Gwyneth Paltrow) is a once-brilliant playwright who peaked at age twelve and has been smoking herself through depression ever since. Chas is a hyper-neurotic fatalist in a red track suit. Richie, a fallen tennis champion, is in love with his  sister Margot (although she is, as is frequently pointed out, adopted) and has been sailing the world on an ocean liner in a futile attempt to get over her.

die_royal_tenenbaums_1.jpg

Now, this movie has several, um, very important lessons buried within its subtext. Such as: the importance of a good soundtrack, and the power of a thick layer of eyeliner. But one thing I distinctly remember my high school self taking away from it at the time was: the benefit of having a uniform. These characters wear basically, if not actually, the same thing every day. But because of that, every single element of their outfit says something about them. Margot Tenenbaum's Lacoste minidress-and-fur coat combo is almost as instantly recognizable as Lady Gaga's bubble outfit, and anyone in a red track suit would be immediately taken for Chas (or his progeny) on any given Halloween. And what I realized, too, when shamelessly mimicking this technique, was that having a "look" makes life (not to mention shopping)...way easier. So check out the movie, buy some tennis clothes, and put a dreamy record on the record player -- until next week.


Speaking of pageantry...

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
prejean01.jpg

Looks like Miss California USA will doing away with the famed swimsuit UNIFORM this year -- but the ever-controversial portion of the evening will  remain. So instead of having all of the competitors wear the same suit, Miss Cali 2010 contenders will be able to choose from a variety of designs from one yet-to-be-named designer. (Too bad Sherri Hill doesn't make bathing attire!) Even weirder, there will be TWO winners of the pageant this year. Normally I would find that surprising, but judging from what happened with Ms. Carrie Prejean last year... I guess a backup can't hurt? What do you guys think? Leave your comments below!

Hampton University: Pageant Scandal

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Wow. This is some crazy business. Two days after having been crowned the first-ever non-black winner of Hampton University's annual beauty pageant, 22-year-old Nikole Churchill actually wrote a letter to... President Obama? Asking that he chide her black classmates for walking out of the ceremony after she won, and for making "negative comments regarding [her] win."


nikole.jpg

Now, there are some interesting racial politics at play here that I definitely think merit some thought. But did this Nikole girl (who will now have a spot in the competition for Miss Virginia) not know she was totally asking for it? Not by entering the contest - obviously I think that anyone who pleases should enter whatever beauty pageant she likes - but with the whole letter deal. I know she must be brutally offended by what appears to basically just be really intense unpopularity (for whatever reason) but even so, perhaps our nation's first-ever black President has, like, bigger fish to fry? Or something? Granted, the girl has apologized for writing this letter and perhaps she didn't totally what she was doing when she sent it. But still... this whole scenario is leaving me with a strange taste in my mouth. What do you guys think?
thurstonmooregossipgirl.jpg

Tonight's Gossip Girl was sort of a big deal, I guess? Rufus and Lily fiiiinally got married, their secret son revealed his identity at the wedding, Georgina Sparks wreaked some havoc, Carter Baizan revealed some MORE dirty secrets, Nate's girlfriend made a dramatic exit (shock), and Sonic Youth showed up at the very end for a surprise performance/to prove the show's hipster cred. Now, I say that the episode was "sort of" a big deal only because, on this show, we have seen Lily married HOW many times? Maybe only twice now, but honestly it seems like more. These days, not even Georgina Sparks, (or the appearance of Thurston Moore and Kim Gordon) can shock me -- in fact, Jenny Humphrey, with her crazy outfits and her even crazier (seriously: like, ludicrous) extensions-plus-hair-and-makeup combo, is the only person who can still make me think twice on this show. Despite the general predictability of the "OMG GG drama," however, a few annoying storylines were semi-wrapped up, so maybe that will give them the opportunity to introduce some new ones? Maybe? Please? Also, as usual, there were some pretty good one-liners -- and even Serena (usually more reliant upon the use of her hair than, ahem, actual lines) got a few sharp comments in. Now let's just wait and see what sort of drama is bound to interrupt the happiness of Rufus and Lily's newly-legal status. Onward, ho!  
This weekend, I saw the remake of Fame. I did not have high hopes for this film. But, having seen the original version maybe sixty times or so between the ages of 12 and 18, in the end I just could not resist. And, in the sense that the movie was a totally Disney-fied, watered-down, big budget-trying-to-look-small budget, generic, and just generally lacking version of the original, I was not disappointed. But there was one good thing that came out of the experience: The new Fame, in all its badness and drippiness, reminded me how utterly awesome is the old Fame. Like, the original one. 

fame-the-movie1_jpg_595x325_crop_upscale_q85.jpg

There are many, many reasons why you should watch the original Fame. It's a movie about a bunch of teenagers who go to the Performing Arts high school in Manhattan -- and so naturally the movie is full of singing, dancing, falling in love, and putting on impromptu dancing-on-tabletops-style performances in the lunchroom. But what separates Fame from, say, Center Stage (which, okay, definitely has its merits) is the fact that this movie was made in 1980 and truly reflects the grittiness, and the insanity, and the generally neurotic subconscious of New York in that era. Which is also to say: the clothes are reflectively amazing. You think American Apparel does good crazy dancer outfits? Think again. Not only is there an astoundingly creative art of layering displayed here, but each character also expresses an incredibly strong individual aesthetic while simultaneously wearing ... believable outfits. (It helps that there is also character development in this film: It's way easier for a stylist to dress a character that has a personality than it is to outfit "just another pretty, demure naive.") 

Perhaps I've been too harsh on this remake. There is some good stuff to be seen in it. Mainly Naturi Naughton, who is an amazing singer and performer -- even if her cardigan-sweater-and-turtleneck ensembles are painfully obv. But an overly-commercial, super-cheesy, big-budget teen movie is even more frustrating when it is a remake of a film that basically represents the opposite of all of those things. Now, I shall stop getting all nostalgic for "my youth" and step down from my soapbox. Just promise me you'll go watch the movie!  

DON'T TRY THIS AT PROM

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Or maybe... do!



vuitton hair.jpg
We call it: VUITTON HAIR.  
Halloween is just around the corner which means that, if you are anything like me, you have approximately three weeks before the time will come to throw open your closet doors in a fit of last-minute, pre-party costume-creationary panic. Now, sometimes that panic is the key ingredient for inspiration; a few of my best costumes of all time have arisen in this manner. But it is always nice to have a backup. And since I know at least one thing that most of you readers have in your closets, I am going to do a little roundup of prom-dress-utilizing (but not ruining - mostly) Halloween costumes.  

1. Carrie
Okay, this one totally will ruin your old prom dress. Or maybe...your sister's? Anyway, if you happen to have a long, plain, strappy, v-neck, and no-longer-in-use dress lying around, this costume is easy, appropriately gory, and fun. All you need is a wig of long, straight, brown hair (if yours isn't already like that), aforementioned long dress, and a LOT of red food coloring applied in an artfully "blood-splattered" manner. And, done! TOTALLY CREEPY. 

carrie.jpg
2. Marie Antoinette
Now, this one requires a slightly fancier dress and many more crazily elaborate accessories (although if you're feeling indie- and Sofia Coppola-inspired, you could always substitute the kitten heels for hot-pink hi-tops). But it also offers endless opportunities for creativity: think layer upon layer of tulle, funny hats, long, golden curls. Obviously the best part about this costume in the Halloween sense of things is that you can include a post-guillotine sort of theme. Eliminating one's head altogether would be tricky to do as a costume, but it would be fairly easy to imagine that the fair Marie had reattached her topper (with a green ribbon, say?) and ... well, I'll let you use your imagination for what exactly that would mean. 
(Sort of like this:
marie antoinette.jpg
but, you know, undead)

3. Morticia Addams
One of our favorite style icons of all time pulled off the Morticia Addams look to great effect years ago, in the film adaptation of the beloved Addams family tv series. Of course, Anjelica Huston always brings her own witchy charm to the table, but for Halloween what you really need to know is: long black dress. Now, lady Addams didn't really show a lot of skin so, if the prom dress in question is a strappy sort of thing, I would suggest covering it up with a drapey, jackety, or flowy (but definitely black) garment on top. (A long cardigan or blazer would be suffiicent.) Then, throw on a long black wig and some white face-paint and you're good to go. (Excessive black eye makeup optional but recommended.)

anjelica.jpg
4. Cleopatra

In (my) recent memory, Cleopatra had a long white toga thing going on, but on the off-chance that you do not have a long white prom dress hanging in your closet, follow the Elizabeth Taylor take: something sexy, faintly toga-like, and accessorized with LOADS of gold jewelry, tons of black eyeliner, and that blunt, black hair. Which means, any plain-colored, simply-cut dress can be given a quick makeover (thick belt, a little toga-esque twist, if possible) to full effect. God, that hair is so amazing:
cleopatra.jpg
Please feel free to go for the mini-braids.

Those are our favorite examples of the moment, but get creative: when you think about it, there are so many things you can do with a prom dress. We'll leave you with a little list of inspirational figures:

 ** Cinderalla, Snow White, Belle, or basically any other Disney heroine other than Nala and Pocahontas (unless you happened to have a really amazing prom dress of past)

** Passengers on the Titanic. Lends endless possibilities in re: the death element

** The White Witch, the White Queen, or any other regal/evil witch-queen

** Mrs. Lovett from Sweeney Todd, or really just Helena Bonham Carter in any iteration.

 
Okay. I am not opposed to Twilight. I like Kristen Stewart, and I do not deny Robert Pattinson's dreamboat good looks, nor his piercing gaze, and although I thought that the book was no Harry Potter, I did appreciate both its and the movie's merits. But upon learning that Nordstrom is debuting a New Moon fashion line, I thought it necessary that someone spoke up. 


Now, obviously Kristen Stewart is gorgeous, and presumably there is a whole team of stylists working on-set to make her look perfectly casual, and Pacific Northwestern, and sporty-yet-feminine during every scene of the film. (Because, as many of you may be able to attest, that is actually not an easy look to achieve. I tried it for many years in college and learned that it's a fine line between "athletically feminine" and... sort of slobby.) But have you people read the book? Wait - I know the answer to that. Basically everyone in this country under the age of 30 has read at least the first installation of the Twilight Saga, and -- forgive me if I go on a little rant here, but -- the fashion described in that book is just TRULY horrendous. Bella swathes herself in sleeveless button-downs and floor-length denim skirts; she admires Edward Cullen's ... white turtlenecks? I'm sorry, but Twilight can be marketed in many ways. And Nordstrom may have hit upon the one facet in which even the most RPattz-obsessed, Bella-emulating, Twilight-fanatic teens may not buy in to. Is anyone with me on this?! 



Lindsay Lohan's Paris Debut

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
This week in Paris, Lindsay Lohan presented her collection as the newly-minted "artistic adviser" of the fashion house Emanuel Ungaro. It was not well-received. Possibly because La Lohan, despite obviously knowing how to spend tons of money on clothes, was never actually trained in re: how to, you know, make them. But really, is Lilo to blame? I mean, yes, the clothes are ... um: 

00090m.jpg

So there is that. But also, I'm of the opinion that it's not Lohan's fault that someone offered the girl a job that she was obviously in no way qualified to do in the first place. What did the company expect?  Furthermore, my guess would be that Lindsay is acting in more of a "muse-like "capacity, and that the real responsibility lies with the little-known Spanish designer Estrella Archs, who was also recently appointed to her post. Which leads me to, would anyone even be talking about this collection at all if not for the stretchpants-happy starlet? Probably not. I'm sure the show would have come and gone with just another "meh" review on style.com and nothing more to speak of. So actually, I say: Well played, Ungaro. People are now talking about you again. What do you guys think? 
Dan-Humphrey-fans-of-gossip-girl-6650564-600-422.jpg

There have been some Facebook grumblings about tonight's episode of Gossip Girl, but I personally have to say that, as it goes, my previous grievances were completely mollified in tonight's installation of the world's favorite crazy teen television drama and so I have no major complaints. For instance: a new character, totally-unrelated to Humphrey-Van Der Woodsen-family history, was introduced for what I assume will be at least several episodes, due to the fact that she is Vanessa's roommate and (wait for it...) Dan's new girlfriend. Needless to say, she is also Hillary Duff, and the plot points surrounding her arrival are totally absurd. But this is Gossip Girl - isn't that the whole point of this show? Actually, what was surprising was the shockingly realistic portrayal of Blair's reaction to her collegiate hierarchical fall-from-grace by... going back to high school to throw her weight around. Don't worry, though - the rest of the show returned to its gloriously preposterous form: Vanessa's roommate turns out to be a Kristen Stewart-worthy teen superstar; Dan, in his total obliviousness in re: anything not related to plaid shirts and/or hacky NY writers, fails to note celebrity of said roommate and starts to date her; Serena befriends Tyra Banks and, totally coincidentally, yet the same teen superstar; and many earnest conversations ensue. Sadly, we also learn that the long-overplayed storylines involving Georgina and fake-brother/V's ex-bf (Scott?) will not only continue, but actually unite. Well! Never a dull night on that Gossip Girl! Until next time! 

Fashion in Film: Rear Window

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Last week, in the inaugural edition of this column, I made clear my affection for pretty girls dressed as adventurous schoolboys. (More on this later on.) But while we are discussing the place of fashion in film, there are a few icons who may not suitably be ignored. Plus, I'm a sucker for a pretty dress. (Duh.) 

Now, being the, um, rebel? that I totally am, I plan to wait until at least week three to discuss the inevitable subject at hand. However, this week's subject is not that far off. 

cusl02_hitchcock0803jpg.jpeg

It should be known that while I have seen some movies in my day, the number that I can claim made a deep, lasting impression on me is very, very small. Rear Window is one of those films. It's the story of a young, extremely dashing wheelchair-bound photographer who, in his boredom-induced idleness, discovers a scandal going down in the apartment directly across from him. It's sufficiently juicy and exciting and suspenseful, and thus, frankly, enough by my standards as it is. But it also happens to be by Alfred Hitchcock, who never failed to make anything he produced look simultaneously creepy and beautiful. And it stars both Grace Kelly and James Stewart, both of whom are practically too charming and attractive for words. I'm pretty sure, however, that this was the first Grace Kelly movie I ever saw -- and having been something of a tomboy, I remember being dumbfounded by the ... pure gorgeousness that the actress managed to exude without also being a total wet blanket. It doesn't hurt that the film has an intricately-woven and deeply satisfying plot (thank you, Hitchcock), or that all of the characters had both looks and substance, but I have to admit that this film presented the feminine aesthetic in such a strong, awesome way that it was impossible for me to resent on any level. That said, Grace Kelly's badass outfits are really only a fraction of a reason to watch Rear Window. You should rent it and do so immediately. In the meantime, you can check out the trailer here...
annex-kelly-grace-rear-window_01.jpg

Candy, anyone?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
lauren-conrad-la-candy.png

So, it looks like little miss Lauren Conrad - who has the Mary-Kate-and-Ashley-esque skill of making billions of dollars for basically no reason (although at least those twins have some crazy style) will be making a movie, which is based on the novel she "wrote," which is based on the "reality" series she starred in, which is based on "her life." (It's hard to tell with that girl where the quotation marks begin and end. I would guess that she might find it confusing, too.) My hope is that, given the potential market value of this movie, some producer will hire someone amazing to re-write the crap out of this story and turn it into a Devil Wears Prada scenario: crappy book, amazing movie. Thoughts?


About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2009 is the previous archive.

November 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.